A randomized, double-blind trial of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Anidulafungin is a novel antifungal agent of the echinocandin class. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous anidulafungin to that of oral fluconazole in 601 patients with endoscopically and microbiologically documented esophageal candidiasis. Patients received intravenous anidulafungin (100 mg on day 1, followed by 50 mg per day) or oral fluconazole (200 mg on day 1, followed by 100 mg per day) for 7 days beyond resolution of symptoms (range, 14-21 days). At the end of therapy, the rate of endoscopic success for anidulafungin (242 [97.2%] of 249 treated patients) was found to be statistically noninferior to that for fluconazole (252 [98.8%] of 255 treated patients; treatment difference, -1.6%; 95% confidence interval, -4.1 to 0.8). The safety profile of anidulafungin was similar to that of fluconazole; treatment-related adverse events occurred in 9.3% and 12.0% of patients, respectively. Laboratory parameters were similar between treatment arms. Anidulafungin is as safe and effective as oral fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis, when assessed at the completion of therapy.
منابع مشابه
In vitro activity of anidulafungin and other agents against esophageal candidiasis-associated isolates from a phase 3 clinical trial.
The efficacy of anidulafungin, an echinocandin antifungal agent with potent anti-Candida activity, in treating esophageal candidiasis was tested in a double-blind study versus oral fluconazole. Isolates were identified and tested for susceptibility. Candida albicans represented >90% of baseline isolates. The MIC(90) of anidulafungin for all strains was 0.06 mg/liter.
متن کاملAnidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis
INTRODUCTION During the past decade, the incidence of Candida infections in hospitalized patients has increased, with fluconazole being the most commonly prescribed systemic antifungal agent for these infections. However, the 2009 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) candidiasis guidelines recommend an echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia/invasive candidiasis in patients who ar...
متن کاملDRUG PROFILE Anidulafungin: a novel echinocandin
971 (2003). 71. Reboli A, Rotstein C, Pappas P, Schranz J, Krause D, Walsh T. Anidulafungin vs fluconazole for treatment of candidemia andinvasive candidiaisis. Presented at: The 45thInterscience Conference on AntimicrobialAgents and Chemotherapy, December 15–19, DC, USA. Abstract 1040, (2005). 72. Schranz J, Krause D, Henkel T. Lack ofinfusion-related adverse events withani...
متن کاملAnidulafungin versus fluconazole for invasive candidiasis.
BACKGROUND Anidulafungin, a new echinocandin, has potent activity against candida species. We compared anidulafungin with fluconazole in a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial of treatment for invasive candidiasis. METHODS Adults with invasive candidiasis were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous anidulafungin or intravenous fluconazole. All patients could receive oral fl...
متن کاملAnidulafungin compared with fluconazole for treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis caused by Candida albicans: a multivariate analysis of factors associated with improved outcome
BACKGROUND Candida albicans is the most common cause of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis. Systemic infections due to C. albicans exhibit good susceptibility to fluconazole and echinocandins. However, the echinocandin anidulafungin was recently demonstrated to be more effective than fluconazole for systemic Candida infections in a randomized, double-blind trial among 245 patien...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
دوره 39 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004